The use and effectiveness of red-light cameras increasingly are being called into question.
State Rep. Jack Franks, D-Marengo, has proposed legislation that would regulate how the cameras could be used and would reduce the fines for red-light camera tickets from $100 to $50.
Meanwhile last month, Lake in the Hills took down two of the three red-light cameras it had installed. Lake in Hills was the first McHenry County community to use the devices.
“From the start, we looked at this as experimental,” said Lake in the Hills Director of Public Safety Jim Wales, adding that there were not enough violations at the two intersections – Algonquin and Hilltop roads and Miller and Randall roads – to justify continued camera use.
From December 2008 until December 2009, the number of violations combined at the intersections was 457. By comparison, the village’s third camera at Randall Road and Acorn Lane by itself had 596 violations during the same time period.
The cameras were meant to target problem areas and improve safety, Wales said, which was why the Acorn Lane camera was staying.
Wales said he was aware of critics who said the cameras were as much about revenue as they were about safety. He said that in Lake in the Hills that was not the case, emphasizing that the village did not use the cameras to issue citations for right-on-red violations.
“If it was about the revenue, we’d be going after the right-on-red violations,” Wales said. “We’re not because it’s not about [revenue].”
People who are turning right often pull up a little farther into an intersection before stopping in anticipation of making the turn. Sometimes motorists do not stop until they are past the painted line at the intersection. Technically, this is a violation.
Wales said Lake in the Hills was most concerned about a vehicle racing through an intersection and striking another vehicle broadside, something that is not a concern when a vehicle makes a right turn at an intersection.
“In a T-bone accident, there is a significant potential for great injury or property damage,” Wales said.
The right-on-red issue was one that Franks specifically was targeting in his legislation.
“[Many] of the violations are for right on red, when the real danger is someone running the red light,” Franks said. “The cameras are not serving the purpose they were intended for. This is quite a moneymaker. They say it is for public safety. If it is, then reduce the fines.”
Franks said changes had to be made if the cameras were going to continue to be used.
“I think its arguable whether it makes an intersection safer,” Franks said. “Let’s assume there are some benefits. We have to get rid of the right-on-red and reduce the fines.”
Unlike Lake in the Hills, Algonquin uses red-light cameras to ticket vehicles for right-on-red violations. However, Algonquin traffic Sgt. Jeff Sutrick said potential violations were reviewed before a ticket was issued.
“The standard we apply is ‘would an officer at the intersection have given a ticket,’ ” Sutrick said. “If someone pulls up and pauses before making a right turn, they probably are not going to get a ticket. We look at all of these cases individually.”
Sutrick said the department was evaluating whether right-on-red violations should be part of how the cameras are used.
Algonquin has a camera at Randall and Bunker Hill roads, two cameras at Algonquin and Randall roads, and one at Algonquin Road and Route 31. Between January and October 2009, Algonquin issued 5,768 red-light camera citations.
Through the first six months of fiscal 2009, revenues related to red-light violations totaled $340,504.
In Lake in the Hills, red-light cameras last year generated about $87,300 in revenue.
Wales said the costs of having a red-light cameras was about $4,500 a month for each camera. He said that the company that Lake in the Hills used, Lasercraft, essentially waived part of the bill if the cameras did not generate enough violations to pay for themselves.
Lasercraft had suggested that the village consider right-on-red violations, which would have boosted the overall number of tickets being issued, Wales said. The village decided against it.
Ultimately, the cameras are meant to be used as preventive, targeted enforcement. Wales said that after a year, it was determined that two of the three cameras in Lake in the Hills were not justified.
Wales said red-light cameras could be an effective tool if used properly and at the right location, he said, but it was difficult to quantify the safety impact the cameras had.
“It’s like a crime prevention program,” Wales said. “How do you prove how many crimes you prevented?”
By BRIAN SLUPSKI, bslupski@nwherald.com
Read the original article from the Northwest Herald.
Why is a red-light camera violation NOT a moving violation?
Because it’s a revenue grab, that’s why!
Not staying anywhere near Randall Road the next business trip, for sure!
—-
“Lake in the Hills”? Sounds wonderful.
But all I could see was strip malls and fast food.
No lake, no hills, no soul.
I just came back from a business trip in your fine state. Then I get a $100 fine for running a red light. Pictures clearly show a truck to my right, an oncomming car from the opposite direction and the side street traffic stopped.The three of us are shown going through the intersection all at the same time, my speed is 26 in a 45 zone. Now what are the odds of all three of us not seeing the light change to yellow and then red. At my speed I would have easily stopped at the light. Two possibilities, the camera timing was broken or maybe, out of state plate – company vehicle – easy revenue. In the photos the lights were not even shown, sneaky camera placement? I’ve been driving since 1973 and have NEVER had a moving violation and take pride in my driving record.
I made a about $3 million last year just looting the hell out of http://instantweeklyprofit.com Man I love my life. Knowledge is power.
I would like to thank you for the efforts you’ve put in writing this site. I’m hoping the same high-grade blog post from you in the upcoming as well. Actually your creative writing skills has inspired me to get my own web site now. Actually the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up is a great example of it.
Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a really well written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely return.
I truly appreciate this post. I have been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You’ve made my day! Thank you again
Hello.This article was extremely fascinating, especially because I was searching for thoughts on this subject last Wednesday.
I like your logo. I can’t master Photoshop at all.
Hey! Just wanted to say great website. Continue with the good work!
considerable daybook you secure
Hi wherever managed you will get this wp style and design from? Could it be tailor made? If so intellect expressing your designers speak to data?
I drove through Lake in the Hills/Algonquin today and was almost in an accident because of the cameras. The light turned yellow and the car in the next lane slammed on her brakes so as not to go through the light, ($100 fine). The car behind came right into my lane to avoid hitting her and I swerved into the next lane to avoid hitting him. Luckily the car in the lane I swerved into was farther back and was able to adjust their speed. I’m scared to drive by any lights now. What if they turn yellow? Will the people in front of me screech to a halt just to avoid a fine and if they do will I be able to stop before I hit their car? Even though we are decelerating from 50 miles an hour we are going to collide at a high speed. I think these lights are endangering people. Going through a yellow light is a lot safer than slamming your brakes on when you’re doing 50 miles per an hour. Spin outs and out of control cars are more dangerous than going through a yellow light. Something has got to be done.
Stop coddling the lawbreakers that endanger the rest of us.
It’ time for drivers to pay more attention to what they are doing.
How about adjusting to driving laws (not speeding through
intersections), rather than trying to revise the laws to meet
their desires.
Wayne Sandman