12

Mayor Daley Says City Will Move Quickly To Propose New Gun Ordinance To Address Supreme Court Ruling

CHICAGO (CHICAGOPRESSRELEASE.COM) — Mayor Richard M. Daley said he is disappointed but not surprised at today’s ruling by the United States Supreme Court that essentially makes Chicago’s prohibition on registering handguns unenforceable.

“Across the country, cities are struggling with how to address this issue. Common sense tells you we need fewer guns on the street, not more guns,” Daley said in a City Hall news conference.

“So, we’re working to rewrite our ordinance in a reasonable and responsible way to protect 2nd amendment rights and protect Chicagoans from gun violence.

We’ll publicly propose our new ordinance soon,” he said.

Today, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment of the Constitution applies to state and local governments, as well as the federal government.

However, the Supreme Court did not strike down any part of the City’s ordinance.

The Court reversed the lower court decision upholding Chicago’s handgun ban but remanded the case to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings.

Technically, this means that Chicago’s current ordinance, which does not allow the registration–and consequently the ownership–of handguns, is still in effect until the 7th Circuit invalidates it.

However, as a practical matter, it is clear that such a provision will ultimately be struck down based on the Supreme Court’s decision in the Heller case in which the Court ruled that Washington D.C.’s handgun ban violated the Second Amendment.

Daley said the City has already gathered opinions from many sources about how the new ordinance might be revised, including reviewing the ordinances and laws that are in place in Washington, D.C., New York, Los Angeles and other cities and states.

On June 18, a City Council Committee conducted a hearing which addressed many of the issues and challenges Chicago faces in crafting a new city ordinance.

During the hearing, many experts and members of the community testified that if handguns are now going to be allowed in homes, the City needs to put in place the strictest laws possible with regard to who is eligible to own a gun.

Daley reminded residents that even though today’s decision for practical purposes renders the prohibition on registering handguns unenforceable, many other city and state regulations remain in place.

He said that it remains illegal:

  • To carry a concealed weapon in the State of Illinois;
  • To possess a gun in the City of Chicago that is not registered with the Chicago Police Department;
  • To possess a gun without first obtaining a Firearm Owner’s Identification Card from the State;
  • To transport any kind of gun in a vehicle in Chicago if the gun is not broken down into a non-functioning state; or,
  • To possess a semi-automatic or automatic assault weapon, laser sight accessories and silencers.

In addition, all registrants must keep their firearms unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device, unless the firearm is in the registrant’s possession at his place of residence or business or while being used for lawful recreational purposes within the City of Chicago.

Daley also addressed his deep concern about some language in the Supreme Court’s decision today.

“To suggest that Chicago’s elected officials haven’t done enough to protect our city’s residents shows many of our highest level officials don’t understand that gun violence pervades America, not just Chicago,” he said.

“When it comes to Chicago, the Court has ignored all that’s been done over the last decade to dramatically lower our homicide and violent crime rates.

“They’ve ignored that thousands of people — from every neighborhood and background — have joined with their elected officials and ministers in marches to protect our children to end the gun violence.
“They don’t reflect that the Chicago Police Department has constantly worked to create new strategies in our most challenged neighborhoods to end the violence. This is one reason why homicides and violent crimes have been dramatically reduced over the last decade. I know it doesn’t feel that way, because one child killed is too many.

“At the same time — and this is just as important — they don’t seem to appreciate the full scope of gun violence in America and that it will continue until we understand that there are reasonable and responsible steps we can take as a nation to help end the needless gun violence and harm that irresponsible people bring on our friends and family,” he said.

The Mayor emphasized that despite the Court’s ruling, he is more determined than ever to continue Chicago’s and the nation’s fight against gun violence in all its forms, including handguns.

“Gun violence is not just a Chicago problem, it is an American problem. And, it will continue until we understand that there are reasonable and responsible steps we can take as a nation to help end the needless gun violence that irresponsible people bring on our friends and family,” Daley said.

He said that:

  • On average in one year, more than 100,000 people in America are shot or killed with a gun.
  • Each day in America, more than 80 people die from guns and another 200 are wounded.
  • Every year in the United States more than 3,000 children and teens are killed by guns.
  • “What is the impact of this violence?” Daley asked. “Mothers and fathers, brothers and sisters, our children and our friends — killed or injured by guns. Homes broken apart, dreams ended. All of it needless.”

“I also want the people of Chicago to understand that even as we rewrite Chicago’s handgun ordinance, we will continue to pursue every avenue that reduces the chance of violence involving a handgun or any other weapon in Chicago,” he said.

The Mayor said that includes working to re-enact the federal ban on assault weapons, pursuing a crackdown on gun shops and their owners, looking for new ways to challenge gun manufacturers, including how they market to young people and continuing efforts to close the “gun show loophole” at the federal level.

“For the safety of our city and on behalf of those who have lost friends and loved ones to gun violence, I will never give up or give in to those who harm others with guns,” he said.

Published in: Local News, Politics Keywords: , , , , , , ,

Related News

Bookmark and Promote!

12 Responses to "Mayor Daley Says City Will Move Quickly To Propose New Gun Ordinance To Address Supreme Court Ruling"

  1. Hello, this is unquestionably a genuinelysuperb post. In theory I’d wish to compose like this too – taking time and real work to make a brilliant write-up.!!!. but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and never seem to acquire anything done. Thank You

  2. This is a indeed good read for me, Must admit that you are person of the finest bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.

  3. Nice site, it was a good read and I couldnt agree more!

  4. The paintball gun does not actually have much of an affect, I would rather play with a cheap paintball marker than not play at all. ;-) Just use what you have and worry about having an enjoyable day!!!

  5. Bert says:

    That’s all we need! Angry unemployed people without benefits and guns!

  6. Dave says:

    Mayor, You raised your hand and swore to uphold the Constitution. Not some, not one area -but not another. Now The Supreme Court has ruled. Either uphold the Constitution, as you are sworn to do, or let someone else honor it. Like the old saying, police are only minutes away when seconds count. I bet you have security at home and on the job. This is America, honor it and the Constitution.

  7. DDS -- NRA Life Member says:

    Mayor Daley said:

    “Across the country, cities are struggling with how to address this issue. Common sense tells you we need fewer guns on the street, not more guns,” Daley said in a City Hall news conference.

    Mark Twain once said the problem is that most of the things Americans know are wrong. Comon sense may say that fewer guns would be better. John Lott once thought so as well. But after some sound research he realized that he was wrong. Mayor Daley might be well advised to read Lott’s book “More Guns, Less Crime”. Perhaps then he would understand that Chicago’s crime problem is caused by having too many criminals “on the street.”

  8. George Sterling says:

    To Mayor Daley
    I saw you giving your anti gun rant on You Tube. I personally consider your anti gun/big government tone to be absolutely un-american, and catering to subserviant and mindless people, some of whom might not mind being totally controlled by big government bureaucrats like yourself.
    YOU have all the guns, organization, courts, and manpower, and the desire to control and propangandize only the most gullible people. And, YOU want to make and enforce all of YOUR laws on the people, which are backed by your guns, and the threat of force on them.
    You and your kind most certainly need to be replaced by true freedom loving americans, who can solve the problems of crime in a more democratic and common sense way, and not take away peoples ability to protect themselves, just as YOUR police and yourself are able to do.
    You are the tail that is wagging the dog, instead of the other way around, as it should be.
    I hope our nation can be saved from people like yourself. It is time to vote tyrants like you out of office.

  9. Bob says:

    The solution is even simpler. If you are the victim of a crime sue the city for first violating your 2nd ammendment rights and second for failure to provide adequate protection for you and you family as a result of number one.
    Then vote them all out of office. The tide is turning in America. Its time for Americans of all races and creeds to take back their country from special interest groups and self seeking politicians.

  10. John says:

    Chicago has one of the highest murder rates in the country. Last weekend there were 60 shooting with 10 resulting in death. Mayor Daley’s policy is the definition of insanity, he continues to do the same thing and expects a different result. It is quite simple: A gun is a tool, it can be used for both good and evil purposes. Mayor Daley’s policy ensures that only evil purposes have a chance to prevail in his city.

    Why is the Mayor opposed to law-abiding citizens possessing the means to protect themselves from armed criminals? Does he not utilize his own security detail who is well-armed? Why is he any different than the people he represents? Perhaps it’s simple, he does not view himself as a servant of the people but rather their superior entrusted to the throne of Chicago by his famlies long-held rule over that city. His life is worth more than those he has sworn to serve and protect. Sad.

  11. Terry says:

    Daley talks about the average of people shot and killed each year, what he does not explain or apparently understand is the majority of these crimes are done by criminals with illegal guns. No matter what laws they have put in effect criminals will not comply (Look at the shootings in Chicago, great job your gun ban has done). Its easy for Mayor Daley to be against firearms, he has armed body guards around him 24/7. The only people Mayor Daley is helping are the criminals. People in Chicago want to be able to protect themselves. Mayor Daley will not allow that to happen. The solution is simple, vote him out!

  12. Scott says:

    Daley and the liberal Chicago press can never get it through their heads, you don’t have anything to fear from the law abiding gun owner. We already comply with all the rules and regulations that are in place now. I don’t carry a weapon, my children don’t carry weapons and yet we are lumped in a group as trigger happy cowboys who want it to be like the wild west, nothing to be farther from the truth, we have guns for personal protection, there aren’t enough police to protect us 24/7. I just want to mention about my brother in law he was a legal gun owner, sadly he was complying with the law when he crossed paths with two meth heads who didn’t obey the law and was trying to steal a car . My brother in law has been dead for over eleven years now, did the gun laws protect him?

Leave a Reply

Submit Comment

© 2012 Chicago Press Release Services.
All rights reserved. XHTML / CSS Valid.
website by prbuilder.com