Two University of Chicago scientists last week appeared at EPA hearings in Rosemont, Ill., to offer support for proposed new regulations on carbon-dioxide emissions from large power plants.
The comments of David Archer, Professor in Geophysical Sciences, and Pamela Martin, Assistant Professor in Geophysical Sciences, came Nov. 19 at hearings on the EPA’s proposed “Tailoring Rule,” which would require industrial facilities that emit at least 25,000 tons of greenhouse-gas pollution annually to obtain permits covering their emissions.
Permit recipients would have to demonstrate their use of the best-available control technologies and energy-efficiency measures to minimize emissions when facilities are built or significantly modified.
The complete statements of Archer and Martin appear below.
David Archer’s statement:
My name is David Archer, and I am a professor at the University of Chicago in the Department of the Geophysical Sciences. I’ve published 80-some peer-reviewed papers and five books on the carbon cycle of the Earth and its interaction with global climate.
I teach a class as part of our core science curriculum about the physics and chemistry of the global warming forecast. It has become the most popular class on campus, even bigger than the class about pirates, which shows the concern that young people have about what business-as-usual is doing to their futures.
One of the books I have the students read is called Six Degrees, Our Future on a Warmer Planet, by Mark Lynas.
The first chapter describes potential impacts of one-degree centigrade average global warming, all the results taken from the mainstream, peer-reviewed climate impacts literature.
Chapter 2 is about two degrees, and so on up to six degrees, the high end of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projection range for the year 2100. It’s a good book, well-researched and clear.
The Earth today is already deep in Chapter 1, one degree. In my opinion, the most profound climate impact of global warming in this country is the ongoing drought in the Southwest.
The climate impacts in later chapters of the book get truly horrific, including droughts and desertification that make the Dust Bowl seem mild. Nebraska used to be a dune field in a warmer climate a few thousand years ago; now we grow wheat there, but it could go back to how it was.
You can imagine mass migration of people, and wars about water and other resources, and failed states. The population of the Earth depends on the infrastructure of our complex society, and if this breaks down, the carrying capacity of the Earth could collapse.
This happened to the Mayans, the most advanced civilization of their day, as a result of extended droughts during the medieval warm time. How many of us would survive if there were no food in the grocery stores?
I come away from the book thinking that ultimately, humankind is better than this. Humans have done amazing things, and this challenge, technologically, isn’t even really all that hard. Coal is by far the most abundant fossil fuel, and the future of climate depends on what we decide to do with the coal.
If hypothetically there were no more coal in the ground, we wouldn’t be going back to the Stone Age, we’d figure out another way to keep things running, no problem. And if the climate starts to bite harder in the future, humankind will figure out ultimately how to leave the coal in the ground.
Since dangerous climate changes are already under way, really fixing the climate means preventing the Earth from getting any warmer than it already has. Our understanding of the physics of Earth’s climate tells us that to do this would require an atmospheric CO2 concentration of 350 parts per million.
The atmosphere already has more CO2 than this, 387 ppm. Even if the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere stopped rising, the Earth would continue to warm for a few decades as the oceans warm up.
This is what they call committed warming. Avoiding that committed warming is where the target CO2 concentration of 350 ppm comes from.
My optimistic opinion is that ultimately, humankind, in the coming decades, will begin to actively scrub CO2 from the atmosphere, as part of an effort to get back to 350 ppm.
Someday someone will clean up the mess. In the larger scheme of things, this wouldn’t be that hard to do. But if this is the ultimate tide of history, there is an easier way to get there, and a harder way.
As with many environmental messes, it would be much cheaper in the long run to avoid emitting so much CO2 to the atmosphere in the first place.
Climate change is more difficult than other challenges humans have faced, only in that it is global, and the tragedy of the commons effect is particularly strong. The people who benefit from using coal are not the same people as pay the price, mostly people in the future and in the developing world.
Will humankind plan intelligently for our collective good, or are we just another out-of-control weed species like so many others in Earth history, doomed to bloom and collapse? This is the decision you’re making.
Pamela Martin’s statement:
My name is Pamela Martin. I am an assistant professor at the University of Chicago. I teach classes in past climate change ― “paleoclimatology” ― chemical oceanography and the science of sustainability.
Looking back into the paleorecords, the records of past climate change, we see abrupt changes, tipping points, changes we can’t fully explain or don’t fully understand. We must look back millions and millions of years to find carbon dioxide levels as high as we have today.
This past fall I have been participating in a seminar with other scientists such as David Archer, who is here today and one of the top experts on the carbon cycle, climate dynamicists who study interactions among components of the climate system, atmospheric chemists and biologists who study the nitty-gritty of photosynthesis.
We have been studying the details of the fate of carbon dioxide that we have emitted into the atmosphere, looking for the natural “sinks” of the CO2 that has cycled through the air. One of the clear sinks for this carbon dioxide is in the oceans, where carbon dioxide acts as an acid and lowers the pH. Some of the other sinks and effects of elevated CO2 are not so clear.
While understanding the sinks of carbon dioxide requires detailed sleuthing, understanding the anthropogenic sources, the major emissions sources, does not. A relatively small number of polluters emit over half of the point-source greenhouse-gas pollution.
And, by starting with the biggest polluters, the EPA is taking an important first step inaddressing greenhouse-gas pollution under the Clean Air Act.
I commend the EPA’s commitment to hold the big polluters responsible first, but I also urge the EPA to work quickly to address the emissions from facilities that emit less than 25,000 tons per year.
I urge the EPA to shorten the proposed timescales of five and six years to address the sources under 25,000 tons.
The longer we wait to take action, the more we are committing to future warming and the more it will cost to address the problem.
Its like you read my mind! You appear to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with some pics to drive the message home a little bit, but instead of that, this is magnificent blog. A fantastic read. I’ll definitely be back.
Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is a very well written article. I will make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your useful info. Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely return.
This web site is without question amazing i enjoy this program checking out your posts. Sustain the truly great deliver the results! You will know, lots of individuals have proven to be hunting across with this tips, you’re able to improve these items greatly.
This is a extremely intriguing read. I have had a career in the solar sector for almost 11 years and it is crazy how quickly the game is progressing. For many of us this is a exhilarating moment of history so let’s hope keep up the pace.
I love your website! did you develop this yourself or did you outsource it? Im seeking a blog style thats comparable so thats the only reason I’m asking. Either way maintain up the great work I was impressed with your content actually
This is very fascinating. I actually get pleasure from your writing style and your word choice considerably more than anything
Many are some of the finest activities cars which can be thought to be ‘girl’ cars. If you’re nonetheless pondering what kind of automobile you intend to receive, find the adhering to: Your selling prices of convertibles start off all-around $20, 000 along with range in price up towards 100 multitude of variety. Motor applied usually are a number of or perhaps 6 hot water tank kinds as you move less affordable versions utilise V6 as well as V8 motor. Repair charges to get convertibles usually are approximately exactly like those of sedans plus technology possesses manufactured gentle covers tougher and many more durable that will endure numerous years of neglect.
I respect your work , thanks for all the interesting posts .
hello there and thank you for your information – We have certainly picked up something new from right here. Used to do however expertise several technical points by using web site, as I experienced to reload the website a lot of times ahead of I can understand to load properly. I’m wondering in case your web hosting service is alright? Not too I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will often affect your placement in the search engines and can damage your good quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I’m adding this RSS to my email and could watch out for a great deal much more of your respective exciting content. Make sure that you update it can soon..
I
You’re able to totally call at your commitment around the succeed you’re writing. Worldwide wants alot more enthusiastic internet writers like you that are certainly not afraid to express the way they consider. Frequently go after ones core..
Have you considered adding some social bookmarking buttons to these blogs. At least for twitter.
My breasts are beautiful, and I gotta tell you, they’ve gotten a lot of attention for what is relatively short screen time. – Jamie Lee Curtis
Good info and right to the point. I don’t know if this is in fact the best place to ask but do you folks have any thoughts on where to employ some professional writers? Thanks :)
Great! Thanks for post
There is no beast so savage but sports with its mate. – Spanish Proverb
neat design here. did you download this of the internet or was it custom made? I haven’t this seen design ever before so that’s why I’m asking..
goodness gracious that was great!
Don’t you just hate the blatant materialism surrounding Christmas? And aren’t you just dying to know what you got?
Ohh very much thanks admin
very good \o/
When I click on your RSS feed it puts up a whole lot of unformatted html, is the malfunction on my side?
azgin bakire kizlarin ilk sikis anlarini gözlerinizi kirpmadan heyecanla izleyeceksiniz.
Tyvm for the helpful info! I would not have discovered this on my own!
To actually make you understand what that is all about, a brief story is in order.
It’s a bonus.
This weblog appears to get a good ammount of visitors. How do you advertise it? It gives a nice individual spin on things. I guess having something real or substantial to post about is the most important factor.
For some reason my browser doesn?t display this page correctly? Anyway, it was a really interesting write-up, maintain up the very good operate and that i will be back for much more
Here are some complicated statistics.
This is probably one of the better articles I have stumbled across on this topic. I would like to know if you have you though about the other side of the argument of natural health? To be candid, I think a good case could be made either way, but let me know if you know of more articles or sources on the Web to verify what you are proposing.
Substantially, the post is really the freshest on this valuable topic. I fit in with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your approaching updates. Just saying thanks will not just be adequate, for the tremendous lucidity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Genuine work and much success in your business efforts!
I will be able to give your pres particularly the identical value you offered mine
The outlets that you want to buy your from are those which service mostly the industry.
Earlie Daltorio